tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11875966.post116288088760934202..comments2023-10-20T07:28:50.948-07:00Comments on Better Bibles Blog: Junia, the Apostle: Part 9Wayne Lemanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18024771201561767893noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11875966.post-65888846427832609912007-05-27T16:04:00.000-07:002007-05-27T16:04:00.000-07:00The sons and daughters were in harsh activitytheir...<I>The sons and daughters were in harsh activity<BR/>their neck in a seal, with a mark among the nations</I><BR/><BR/>This should read "in harsh captivity".Suzanne McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07033350578895908993noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11875966.post-1162921172918537882006-11-07T09:39:00.000-08:002006-11-07T09:39:00.000-08:00This is so educational. Thank you!This is so educational. Thank you!Kevin Knoxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16788817477327510023noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11875966.post-1162914479907035872006-11-07T07:47:00.000-08:002006-11-07T07:47:00.000-08:00Thanks Peter,There is still a lot to cover. I will...Thanks Peter,<BR/><BR/>There is still a lot to cover. I will have to take a break and publish an index and bibliography. That will be my next post.Suzanne McCarthyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07033350578895908993noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11875966.post-1162892685725702212006-11-07T01:44:00.000-08:002006-11-07T01:44:00.000-08:00Well said, Suzanne.It is clear, indeed explicit in...Well said, Suzanne.<BR/><BR/>It is clear, indeed explicit in their words "<I>As a working hypothesis</I>" coming before "<I>We now turn to the actual data</I>", that Wallace and Burer presupposed the conclusion which fitted their pre-existing belief that a woman could not have been called an apostle. Yes, they do say that "<I>this is merely a working hypothesis, and one that is falsifiable</I>". But were they really prepared to allow it to be falsified? It seems to me that there is ample evidence to falsify their hypothesis, but that Wallace and Burer have chosen to present this evidence in a way which hides the falsification. I hope that Suzanne will be able to demonstrate this; she may want to refer to another paper which does a good job of this.Peter Kirkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13395635409427347613noreply@blogger.com