tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11875966.post113924820849765569..comments2023-10-20T07:28:50.948-07:00Comments on Better Bibles Blog: The Jews in John's GospelWayne Lemanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18024771201561767893noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11875966.post-1139406510181225512006-02-08T05:48:00.000-08:002006-02-08T05:48:00.000-08:00maybe better yet, arguably poor scholarship.maybe better yet, arguably poor scholarship.Ted M. Gossardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10580691315315271791noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11875966.post-1139406238565190172006-02-08T05:43:00.000-08:002006-02-08T05:43:00.000-08:00Actually my use of "squabble" is surely a poor cho...Actually my use of "squabble" is surely a poor choice of words since it takes two to do that. One side I just don't see acting on scholarly grounds. I regret to say this.Ted M. Gossardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10580691315315271791noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11875966.post-1139405900706472542006-02-08T05:38:00.000-08:002006-02-08T05:38:00.000-08:00Yeah Peter. I think I learned that on my blog.Than...Yeah Peter. I think I learned that on my blog.<BR/><BR/>Thanks for your informative post in this translation squabble (it seems to me to be less than scholarly as to the argument against it). I hate to think that of those who oppose the tniv, and using this as one of their grounds. I stand to be corrected. But what I read from you and have read seems only to verify it.Ted M. Gossardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10580691315315271791noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11875966.post-1139313976234807722006-02-07T04:06:00.000-08:002006-02-07T04:06:00.000-08:00There seem to be some strange effects here concern...There seem to be some strange effects here concerning the order in which postings appear on this blog. This posting <I>The Jews in John's Gospel</I> was posted after <I>Rereading Psalm 100:3: In Search of a Better Translation</I> and <I>"You say so" continued</I>, but before <I>Propitiation</I>. This one originally appeared before <I>Rereading Psalm 100:3: In Search of a Better Translation</I> and <I>"You say so" continued</I> because it was dated 9.01 AM Monday (PST?) which was probably the time at which I started to write it, although I completed it and posted it some hours later. I guess that Wayne noted the anomaly and so changed the time stamp on my posting to 9.01 AM Tuesday - still in the future if PST - and so appears at the top of the blog. Well, thank you, Wayne, for giving my posting priority over your own ones; but it might be better to adjust its time to the actual time of posting, which was about 1.00 AM GMT. For this has had the unfortunate result that Suzanne's important posting <I>Propitiation</I> appeared in second place on the blog even when it was first posted, and so isn't getting the visibility which it deserves.<BR/><BR/>It seems to me that it is an undesirable feature, even a bug, in the Blogger software that postings are by default given the date of when editing of them is started, rather than the date (which could be some time later) when they are completed and posted. It is probably a good idea if we who post remember to adjust the dates and times of any postings which are not posted immediately after editing of them is started (and I will need to remember to adjust these times to PST). Sorry that I did not do this and so caused some confusion.Peter Kirkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13395635409427347613noreply@blogger.com