Thy fellow human being
It is a day of rest so I thought that I would translate an interesting paragraph from German instead of Greek. As they say, a change is as good as a rest!
This is from Hoffnung für Alle, Galatians 5:13-15.
But the radical expression 'fellow human being' calls for an end to slavery, an end to racism, and an end to declaring that men and women have different fulfillments in this life.
I have actually heard people talking about how those of a different race may not have the same need for freedom as we do. 'Others', supposedly, can tolerate oppressive conditions because they do not 'feel it' as we do. Imputing such notions to others, differentiating between the peoples of the east and west, or between the rich and the poor, between husbands and wives, all denies the equal and radical call to freedom that is the theme of the epistle to the Galatians.
This is from Hoffnung für Alle, Galatians 5:13-15.
- Durch Christus wurde euch die Freiheit geschenkt, liebe Brüder und Schwestern! Das bedeutet aber nicht, dass ihr jetzt tun und lassen könnt, was ihr wollt. Dient vielmehr einander in Liebe. 14 Denn wer dieses eine Gebot befolgt: »Liebe deinen Mitmenschen wie dich selbst!«, der hat das ganze Gesetz erfüllt. 15 Wenn ihr aber wie die Wölfe übereinander herfallt, dann passt nur auf, dass ihr euch dabei nicht gegenseitig fresst! HFA
- Through Christ freedom has been given to you, dear brothers and sisters. That doesn't mean that you can now do, and not do, whatever you want. Rather serve each other in love. Then whoever follows this one command "Love thy fellow human being as thyself!" they have the whole law fulfilled. But when you pounce on each other like wolves, then watch out that you are not thereby devoured in return. (free tr. from the German)
- 13My friends, you were chosen to be free. So don't use your freedom as an excuse to do anything you want. Use it as an opportunity to serve each other with love. 14All that the Law says can be summed up in the command to love others as much as you love yourself. 15But if you keep attacking each other like wild animals, you had better watch out or you will destroy yourselves. CEV
- ὑμεῖς γὰρ ἐπ' ἐλευθερίᾳ ἐκλήθητε ἀδελφοί μόνον μὴ τὴν ἐλευθερίαν εἰς ἀφορμὴν τῇ σαρκί ἀλλὰ διὰ τῆς ἀγάπης δουλεύετε ἀλλήλοις 14 ὁ γὰρ πᾶς νόμος ἐν ἑνὶ λόγῳ πεπλήρωται ἐν τῷ ἀγαπήσεις τὸν πλησίον σου ὡς σεαυτόν 15 εἰ δὲ ἀλλήλους δάκνετε καὶ κατεσθίετε βλέπετε μὴ ὑπ' ἀλλήλων ἀναλωθῆτε
- 3:28 Faith in Christ Jesus is what makes each of you equal with each other, whether you are a Jew or a Greek, a slave or a free person, a man or a woman. CEV
But the radical expression 'fellow human being' calls for an end to slavery, an end to racism, and an end to declaring that men and women have different fulfillments in this life.
I have actually heard people talking about how those of a different race may not have the same need for freedom as we do. 'Others', supposedly, can tolerate oppressive conditions because they do not 'feel it' as we do. Imputing such notions to others, differentiating between the peoples of the east and west, or between the rich and the poor, between husbands and wives, all denies the equal and radical call to freedom that is the theme of the epistle to the Galatians.
17 Comments:
Interesting........
Correct me if I'm wrong, but you seem to imply *universal* love.
In fact, in french, 'πλησίον' is translated as 'Prochain', which mean 'next', in other word, *whoever* comes next.
However, both in Hebrew(H7453), Greek (πλησίον-G4139) and Latin (proximum), these words imply proximity and nearness, and is almost always accompanied by a *possesive* 'my', 'your' etc. indicating someone being *close* to the addressee (hence neighbor).
Saying that, I like the idea of loving my 'prochain' as much as - as the concordant version gives it - my associate. I guess I could call them my come-uponners (a bit of a torturous word I know) or my approxi-mates :)
Thanks God that Jesus was asked to define πλησίον in Luke 10:29 !
Your post has a nice thought though. Thank you.
Sylvanus,
I did a thorough study the Hebrew, Greek, Latin, German and French as an underpinning to this post and then I just thought it was too detailed. However, since you bring it up, yes, it is 'the one who is next to us' in Greek, Latin, German and French.
But let's start with the Hebrew, comrade, and then look at Leviticus 19, and how this ethic is extended to the stranger. In the Jewish perspective there are two interpretations, the ones who are 'of us', and the 'strangers' also.
As you note it is the 'next one' in Greek, French, German and Latin. But think of the typical German translation, not nachbar (neighbour) but nachste (the next one).
So in English the fossilized term neighbour does no justice to the Greek, πλησιον. English has the worst way of translating this of any of these languages.
My first thought is to admit the inadequacy of the English translation for this word, 'neighbour', and then let us be challenged by the German thinking on this subject.
So Sylvanus, I write to provoke thought on the inadequacy of English and like you I find 'the one that I come upon', as the Samaritan did, is a good thought.
Thanks for your thoughtful response.
Matthew
due to the fact that the issue was really resolved quite some time ago for myself
What are your opinions in this regard? You have a very strong reaction to my post, but I am not sure why, so I would rather not head off in the wrong directon on this. Coudl you articulate your own thoughts on these matters?
My own opinions have been shaped by years of working with different cultural and social groups, and should be primarily understood in that respect.
However, on gender it is probably only safe to give the personal anecdote that my brother and his daughters and myself, all have similar academic and career interests. What we share genetically in our intellect far surpasses our identities as male and female. But you must not take that as any derogation of our condition as male and female. We are multidimensional creatures.
Totally off-topic and irrelevant, but how come Paul gets a pass when it comes to (mis?)quoting Scripture? I Cor. 2:9 supposedly quotes Is. 64:4, but in my text there's a big difference between what Isaiah said and what Paul said.
Matthew,
I don't want to carry this into the realm of psychology as I am not trained in that area. So please don't take my comments as anything more than a guide for how to 'treat' people. I don't want to wander any further into the realm of identity and abstraction.
I am not promoting any sort of androgyny, or the erasing of cultural and ethnic identity.
Matthew -
I guess... maybe. But it's not just that Paul uses the verse to support a diferent idea. What concerns me is that the quoted version means something different than the verse from Isaiah. Yes, he mostly used the same words and phrases, but to be honest, I'd feel less awkward about it if he'd rephrased it and kept the meaning the same.
Thank you for your help! :)
Matthew,
I find your discussion quite interesting but beyond the scope of this blog.
Since you seem both done on the matters of the above debate (Posting guidelines: Blog posts and comments should focus on Bible translation issues, not personalities), and since I had quite some time to think about it (and very unsuccessfully I must say), I was just wondering, for the sake of making Bibles Better, how would m.j.mansini translate the word commonly (but uncorrectly) rendered as neighbour, πλησίον?
Sylvanus,
Thank you, that is much more to the point!
Sylvanus,
My sense is that German has a good resolution with Mitmensch, 'fellow human', but French is much more problematic, with 'prochain', 'semblable', 'concitoyen', 'camarade'. At least in English we can say 'fellow human', maybe that is the best sense for πλησιον.
Have you looked at Leviticus 19?
Thank you for reminding me of Lev 19 (I'd forgotten). so I read the whole chapter, but wasn't quite sure where, as you previously mentioned, the ethic was extended to the stranger as related to your original main post, since verse 34 makes that one a neighbour, one living next door (despite the separateness of the Israelites). Maybe I misunderstood you.
In that chapter, there were two word of interest to me (both translated as 'neighbour' in the KJV):H5997 and H7453. However, the second seems to be by definition a more personal noun than the first. Sometimes it comes second in the verse (vs16&18), sometimes it comes first (v13)- Just a thought (Proverbs like Lev19 does that a lot)
I now only a couple of words in German, and probably not worth boasting about, but French, I know well. Problematique you say? Let me help maybe: In the French colloquial, I think concitoyen is too charged ever since the late 1700's, while camarade is more for children or communists. As for semblable it may be too related to the same kind. Prochain, however, is possibly more like the German nachste (though I can only assume that). It is invariably used to describe anyone from the human kind that happens to come across your way. There is no other definition, and is nationally known to come from the Scriptures.
I like fellow human, I truly do, but I ask myself: Why would a man of such knowledge ask Jesus to define who is his fellow human (Luke 10:29)?
After a wave crossed my brain, I came up with some words to challenge the inadequacies of the English tongue: What do you think of these?
A concomitant. An accompany A collaterate. They don't sound very friendly but there you go......'others' is much simpler perhaps.
Sylvanus,
I mentioned 'concitoyen' only to show τhe parallel construction with Mitmensch. So συνεργος is 'coworker' or 'fellow worker' in the epistles, 'mitarbeiter' in German and 'compagnon d'oeuvre' in French. I am really trying, like you, to look at all the possible variations.
Now I have to confess that I am not familiar with how you are indexing your Hebrew words. Is there somewhere I can look up your numbers? Thanks.
Back to 'prochain' and 'nächste', they seem to be somewhat transparent. But the German has two words nachbar (English - neighbour) and nachste. SO neighbour in English is just not transparent enough to be equivalent to the Greek πλησιον. IMO
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
As you say 'others' does keep things simple and not too weighty philosophically! I certainly can't find fault with that.
Suzanne
I am indexing according to Strong's numerical System. I am sure you've got it somewhere on your harddrive, otherwise:
http://www.blueletterbible.org/search.html#strongs
or
http://www.biblestudytools.net/Lexicons/
There are versions using 'others' or 'one another' etc. Sometimes the KJv does. and although its not that accurate (I'm a bit fussy) I think it's a good compromise, and 'fellow human' could be used in other passages.
thank you for your post
You said:
Do theological presuppositions in a translator not become a "translatioin issue"?
It seems to me that theological bias is an inherent issue with any translation of Biblical texts.
The text is never the only factor, despite how much we wish it could be
I agree. And I think it is a shame (and more). And to impose one's presumed thoelogical bias to change the sacred text is in my opinion wrong (and more). To express it elswhere is quite another thing. Those changes are what prompted me to translate the NT without bias and with full transparently on my site, and highlight mistranslations on my blog (see my profile).
As for the guidelines, these are those of this blog, and I do not presume to enforce them. Suzanne however, a contributor to this blog, and the author of the post, has undirectly implied them (more than once).
I do not know much about philosophy or else (I am no schoolard), and my words are simple, I am a simple man, so discussing multidimentional issues are way past me, I rather do this with someone face to face and heart to heart, not on the net (it doesn't usually comes to much).
Thanks anyway
My intent was to highlight how a certain German translation had resolved the problem of translating πλησιον. The most unbiased way, it seems to me, would be, "Love the one who is next to you as yourself." Not too out of the way.
Matthew,
Have you any suggestions as to how to tanslate πλησιον?
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home