Better Bibles Blog has moved. Read our last post, below, and then
click here if you are not redirected to our new location within 60 seconds.
Please Bookmark our new location and update blogrolls.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

The Lord's Prayer is in perpetual error

Read Kevin Sam's post and see if you agree: The Lord's Prayer is in perpetual error


At Tue Sep 23, 08:19:00 AM, Blogger Bob MacDonald said...

like inerrancy, the claim to error in the LP is nonsense to me.

At Tue Sep 23, 11:58:00 AM, Blogger Peter Kirk said...

Kevin is certainly correct in terms of the original text. That doesn't invalidate us closing our own prayers with a suitable doxology.

At Tue Sep 23, 02:35:00 PM, Blogger David Ker said...

Well, it's probably the best case study for asking questions about when we call the canon closed. Are these words acceptable? How about the woman caught in adultery in John 8? Historically these passages have been esteemed and accepted so calling them "not original" and then rejecting them seems wrong.

This morning I was reading the beatitudes with my kids from Matthew and Luke. We were asking questions about why each evangelist recorded Jesus' words that way rather than "which were the original words of Jesus."


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home